This Document in pdf at: https://bit.ly/3G86x4V

The need for scientists to take responsibility in determining what is more cost-effective in detecting particles in physics experiments

450 million Europeans want to know from scientists what works best in reducing suffering, deaths and costs of cancer

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT – Parliamentary questions

21 June 2021 (Translated in 24 languages) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-003244_EN.html

To: Martin Purshke Convener N-17, DAQ Trigger High Energy Physics, 20 Oct. 2021 IEEE-NSS Conf.

Dear Martin,

Please read the report about the suffering and pain of the person dear to me (https://bit.ly/3Aks5bd; blog: https://bit.ly/3AwJj5z) like millions of other people who suffer because they discovered tumors at stage 3 or 4.

We are not on this planet to show our power in suppressing others but to use logical reasoning to understand the laws of nature for improving the quality of life to everyone and to use compassion to alleviate suffering.

I am asking the organizers of the 2021 IEEE-NSS-MIC-RTSD Conference for transparency and scientists to take responsibility for providing logical and scientific answers.

At your Session 10 Oct. 2021 I asked the following question in the chat line:

“Question to the speaker and everyone: “Are you aware of the fully programmable, technology-independent, 3D-Flow architecture/system for L-1 Trigger, officially and formally recognized a breakthrough invention in 1993, which every 15 years gains ten times in speed, consumes 1/10 and costs 1/200, which is more efficient and lower cost than any current L-1 Trigger design/implementation, but has been suppressed for 28 years as reported in https://bit.ly/2X4XVuc?” What would you suggest changing to be fair to Science, taxpayers and future researchers?”

Instead of reading my question to the participants as you did with the other questions, taking responsibility and expressing your consideration, you dismissed my question, did not read it and said:

“Yes, we are completely aware of the 3D-Flow and everyone has an opinion, the answer is yes we are aware of that”.

If you are all aware and have an opinion, scientific conferences like this are the best arena to compare and discuss different opinions and it should be the responsibility of the scientific community toward science, taxpayers and the public to address and resolve with logic discrepancies, in particular when are accumulated to 28 years in using less efficient systems costing millions of dollars more.

One would expect a logical answer from a scientist: “Here is the reference to two or even just one project that can be compared in efficiency and costs with the 3D-Flow” The he/she should provide the reference of the alternative project that should be compared with.

Or you can request to talk to an engineer of a company (or even more than one), who made the 59 quotes for building the components, electronic boards, powers supplies, chassis, etc. of my 3D-Flow system described in 271-page document (goo.gl/w3XlZ1) because you would like to make sure that he can deliver what he promised in the quote.

Because I could not talk at your session, my microphone was muted like everyone else, I wrote a short message bring the attention to my second question and wrote:

“Martin Purschke, because you are aware, what would you suggest to change to be fair to future researchers?”

But again, you did not take responsibility and censured my question with no scientific reason.

Dismissing my question and not having a reference that you could provide to compare in cost and performance with the 3D-Flow and by not having objections to my design proven feasible with simulation of the entire system and proven functional in hardware on two modular electronic boards that could be replicated to a 3D-Flow system for detectors of any dimension, is it because of a coverup reason?

Next year the IEEE-NSS-MIC-RTSD will be held in Milan, Italy. Would the suppression of transparency and censure with no scientific reason continue?

Below I provide the screenshot of the online chat window at the conference.

Kind Regards,

Dario Crosetto

President of the Crosetto Foundation for the Reduction of Cancer Deaths

900 Hideaway Pl

DeSoto, TX 75115

Email: crosettodario@gmail.com