Information, Awareness, Prevention / United to End Cancer

The Future is in Our Hands

mobile_seal_header

Contact

Dialogue

Needless Deaths:
One Every 4 Seconds

A 3D-CBS EXAM COULD AND
CAN SAVE MORE THAN 50%
OF THOSE WHO TAKE A
REGULAR SCREENING TEST

How can we provide benefits to humanity?

Benefits to humanity are provided through
the DIALOGUE Concerning the Two Systems:

Saving Lives or Increasing Cancer Business

between D.B. CROSETTO and the POWER,
stimulated by the CURIOUS journalist.

We can defeat cancer together by requesting anyone claiming an idea to defeat cancer to provide a study and, after receiving funding, testing it on a sample population in a specific area showing a significant cancer death reduction.

For example, test the effectiveness of their product on a sample population age 55-74 taken from a location where the cancer mortality rate has been constant for the past 20 years. The % reduction will quantify their efficacy.

The 3D-CBS invention capable to detect tumors of only 100 cancerous cells was boycotted for 20 years. Now that has been proven correct by third parties and an exam on the less efficient copies cost $10,000, how many needless additional deaths will it take to prove Crosetto’s claim his invention can perform an exam costing only $200 and save millions of lives with the TB-CAD (Computer-Aided Diagnosis)?

Support with a donation the Dialogue to make the truth for the benefits of humanity emerge and prevail.

Significant posts on the DIALOGUE

Concerning the Two Systems: «Saving Lives or Increasing Cancer Business»
between D.B. CROSETTO and the POWER (Scientists, Governments, Money), stimulated by the CURIOUS journalist.

A great difficulty I have found is to make the citizen understand the inconsistency and the logical step to solve it.

Galileo had had a brilliant idea that had greatly disturbed the luminaries and the Church. He had explained the arguments for and against the geocentric system (earth at the center of the Universe) and heliocentric (The sun at the center of the solar system) by setting up a dialogue between Salviati (heliocentric) and Simplicio (geocentric) with the third interlocutor Sagredo who represents the discreet reader who intervenes in discussions asking for explanations, contributing with more colloquial arguments.

I started a similar dialogue on Facebook (https://bit.ly/3kcugIQ) by creating the character: the CURIOUS who asks naïve questions in trying to understand why the global cancer cost is over one trillion per year, it is increasing as well as the 10 million cancer deaths per year is increasing and there is no significant different in cancer death between countries that spend a lot of money versus those that do not spend money to fight cancer. Countries that do not spend money to fight cancer even show a lower cancer deaths rate.

These results should tell us that we should check the efficacy of the proposed projects claiming a reduction in cancer deaths by checking first the calculations of the study of the proposer and after receiving funding, projects should test the efficacy of their product or procedure on a sample population in a specific area.

Experimental results should show a reduction of cancer deaths in that area before wasting billions of dollars extending the use of a product or procedure to the world just to create a business that impoverishes the poorest by creating illusions in their minds to buy life but in reality deceiving them with false advertising.

Dialogue between two responsible citizens:

1. A CURIOUS
2. A REASONABLE

CURIOUS: Yes, but how much does it cost to save a life from cancer with 3D-CBS compared to the current cost?

REASONABLE: The question is relevant and the current cost of saving a life from cancer can be calculated by an elementary school student. It requires to divide the global cost of cancer by the number of lives saved, which is obtained by subtracting the number of cancer deaths of one year from the previous year. This calculation is simple in Italy because the population is constant at 60 million.

For Italy for example: The cost per life saved is over €17 million, calculated for the year 2012 by dividing the cost of cancer of € 20 billion per year (https://bit.ly/3qVv9pS) by the difference in deaths between 2012 and 2013 which was 1,134 lives saved (https://bit.ly/3fUUDjW see website https://bit.ly/37sreZZ), (€20,000,000,000 divided by 1,134 = €17,636,684). For the other years cancer deaths in Italy increased in the absence of an increase in the population, so the €20 billion/year mainly increased the cancer business (https://bit.ly/3pv3qwe see website https://bit.ly/3pv30Ga).

For the United States: The cost per life saved is over $10 million, calculated for the year 2003 by dividing the cost of cancer by $64 billion annually published in Fortune Magazine March 22, 2004, pp. 76-94 (https://bit.ly/3uRM8KE) by the difference in cancer mortality of 5,800 between 2003 and 2002, normalized for the population increase as reported in more detail on pp. 13-14 of the book published by World Scientific (http://bit.ly/2IM0EjE), ($64,000,000,000 divided by 5,800 = $11,034,482).

Worldwide: The cost per life saved with my 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) invention that can be applied anywhere in the world is less than $140,000.

CURIOUS: This is a huge saving! How much is it exactly? How do you explain this difference? How did you calculate the cost per life saved with the 3D-CBS?

REASONABLE: Here is the calculation of the difference in cost:

It would cost 82 times less than in United States ($11,034,482/$134,508 = 82), 152 times less than in 2012 in Italy (€17,636,684 / €115,598 = 152) and 17,301 times less than in other years in Italy (€20,000,000,000 / €115,598 = 17,301). To calculate the cost per life saved with the 3D-CBS I have used the same criteria of dividing the global cost of cancer for a number of years by the number of lives saved in the same period. I will provide more details on this calculation later.

CURIOUS: What about the other countries? How much is the annual cancer cost? And how much is the global cancer cost each year in the world?

REASONABLE: The cost of cancer in United States in 2020 increased to $208.9 billion per year (https://bit.ly/36z8Ptj), while in Japan in 2011 was $88 billion per year (https://bit.ly/3ej0WfM). The global cancer cost (business???) in the world is $2.02 trillion per year (***).

CURIOUS: Who pays this € 20 billion a year for cancer in Italy and $208.9 billion per year in United States, $88 billion per year in Japan, and so on?

REASONABLE: We pay them.

CURIOUS: And how?

REASONABLE: With the tax paid on gasoline, motorways, with the VAT paid on the food we buy, etc.

CURIOUS: And how much does this €20 billion/year in Italy cost to each Italian?

REASONABLE: The elementary school student can again provide the answer by dividing €20 billion per year by the population in Italy of 60 million, i.e. cancer in Italy costs € 333 per person per year (€20,000,000,000 divided by 60,000,000 = €333). For example, a couple with two children, even if the children are only a few months old, the cancer costs them € 1,332 per year even if none of them have ever had cancer have never been to the hospital, to the doctor or took medicine.

In Japan cancer cost is $691 per person per year, in United States is $784 (https://bit.ly/3ej0WfM), while in Romania and Bulgaria is €83, in Poland is €140, in France €502, in Germany €562 and in Switzerland €840 per person per year as published by the European Journal of Cancer (https://bit.ly/3xJkXUA).

CURIOUS: But those who pay more, do they receive more? Such as more people saved or have a lower cancer mortality rate?

REASONABLE: No, data show that globally do not save more lives (***) and do not have a lower mortality rate (https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/39-All-cancers-fact-sheet.pdf).

CURIOUS: This is really throwing taxpayer money out of the window. Why politicians are permitting this? Why journalists and media do not inform the public?

As an alternative to these € 17 million for each life saved from cancer (or € 20 billion if no life is saved as has happened every year outside of 2012), how much would it cost to save a life from cancer with Dario Crosetto’s 3D-CBS?

It would cost 152 times less than in 2012 (€ 17.636.684 / € 115.598 = 152) and 17.301 times less than in other years (€ 20.000.000.000 / € 115.598 = 17.301), that is, it would cost only € 115.598 for each life saved based on the detailed calculations below and in literature references which are as understandable as the calculations above.

CURIOUS: Now I understand why question *** regarding the 3D-CBS project was asked at the European Parliament, but why this question is not asked at the Italian Parliament, at the US Congress, at the Japanese Parliament and at the Parliaments of many democratic civilized countries in the world?

REASONABLE: It is understandable even to a child that those who manage our tax money are throwing billions of euros out of the window (or funding the cancer business) without being able to reduce cancer mortality, while there are people on the front line who they give body and soul, they work for free, and some even give their lives (such as doctors, nurses, law enforcement, and public service workers who died of COVID-19 to save others), even without resources, to alleviate cancer suffering and mortality.

Faced with this incongruity of being able to save over 2.6 million lives from cancer in Italy and save over € 355 billion in 30 years with the 3D-CBS, it is a duty and urgent that there be at least one deputy who presents a question to the Italian Parliament and ask influential executives who award research grants using taxpayers’ money to express their disagreement with the calculations below regarding Dario Crosetto’s 3D-CBS project.

These calculations are as understandable as those reported above and in case of disagreements, finance the construction of two 3D-CBS devices, so that the JUDGE is the result of an experiment, that is of the test on a sample population in a specific location for verify its effectiveness.