Complete document in pdf in English at: https://bit.ly/3dkLcbp

On Facebook in English at: https://bit.ly/3lw40ci

 

(Original post in English) in pdf: https://bit.ly/3r5045F

On the Website: https://bit.ly/2ZjnqJk

 

Volunteers work for free while Executives spend €20 billion/year in ITALY without reducing cancer deaths and ignore, or worse, some censor/suppress innovations for the benefit of humanity.

 

Summary: Dario Crosetto respectfully asks journalists to inform taxpayers about the deceiving statements of executives who claim they want to defeat cancer while irrefutable facts and data show that every year 20 billion euros spent on cancer do not reduce mortality in the constant Italian population. Are decision makers deliberately deceiving citizens by promising and making believe that, by appropriating more billions of euros from taxpayers, they will defeat cancer, but they do not even possess a theoretical, strategic, logical study that proves it, which can then be verified every year by experimental measurements? Furthermore there is evidence of incorrect assessments carried out in 2004 in Italy (confirmed by experimental measurements in subsequent years) by the experts of the Istituto Superiore della Sanità who had stated that it would have not been useful the innovation/project/3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) with a detector longer than one half meter to find tumors with only 100 cancer cells, requiring a very low dose of radiation and very low cost of the exam. There is also evidence that for over twenty years the 3D-Flow and 3D-CBS innovations and recently the TB-CAD innovation for saving millions of lives and saving billions of euros have been deliberately censored/suppressed damaging the whole of humanity.

 

I am available to answer any questions (which you can submit to my personal address crosettodario (at) gmail.com), to provide evidence to support what was stated in the long previous paragraph and then if we worked together through dialogue, using your logic and that of your experts, TOGETHER we will have the STRENGTH to Defeat Cancer.

 

Volunteers, doctors, nurses, health workers who work on the front line with cancer patients (and who give body and soul, many work for free and some even give their lives to alleviate the suffering and death of cancer patients) find themselves in the impossibility of saving the patient’s life because the cancer was diagnosed late and the managers, instead of providing him with effective screening tools, deceptively promise to defeat the cancer, while in reality they continue to promote the illogic of spending 20 billion euros every year , without obtaining results in reducing cancer mortality in a constant Italian population, and on the other hand ignore, or worse, some censor/suppress the innovation of an effective tool for early cancer diagnosis that could have already saved millions of lives and billions of euros

 

An Italian family of 4, even in the case of a child who is only three months old and none of the 4 has ever had cancer, pays over 1,300 euros per year in cancer taxes (collected by the state from the tax on petrol, household appliances, cars, food, etc.) and in the 18 years elapsed before children become adults the family will have paid over 24,000 euros (€20 billion / 60 million population x 4 people in the family x 18 years = €24,000). This money is really thrown out the window because other countries that don’t spend €20 billion/year on cancer, the mortality is the same.

 

On December 6, 2021, this unsuccessful tax drain will escalate with the vote of European parliamentarians that has created a Commission that promises to defeat cancer “BEating CAncer” BECA https://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/it/beca/home/highlights but which has not identified the tool for early diagnosis tested on a sample population in a specific area that demonstrates that it reduces mortality compared to the past when this tool or procedure was not used or with respect to another area where it is not used.

 

If a journalist investigates and then some lawyer intervenes, the parliamentarians who will vote on December 6, 2021 the deception of promising to defeat cancer while knowing that this is false because the program in the rapporteur of the Honorable Veronique Trillet-Lenoir (https://bit.ly/3i3ONOj) together with the 1537 amendments and the approval by over 15 experts (https://bit.ly/30ewhMK) does not present any calculation that proves to be able to defeat cancer, would follow it the same fate as the trial that is taking place these days to Elizabeth Holmes who faces 20 years in prison precisely because she was aware that her promise of the results of a blood test was false https://bit.ly/3FIFqMS)? BECA report, 1,537 amendments proposes to use the methods of current screening of which they have the results on hundreds of millions of people for tens of years that does not significantly reduce premature mortality from cancer and therefore cannot defeat it.

 

Scientists and journalists with ethical-professional integrity did not take responsibility for investigating Holmes’ inconsistencies for many years. It took 12 years for a reporter to investigate and expose Elizabeth Holmes’ deception to bring her to justice.

 

If it will be more difficult to bring to justice the parliamentarians who vote for these inconsistencies, illogicalities that deceive and harm citizens, it is at least important that journalists inform citizens about these facts, warning them, giving them the tools to question their political representative and eventually look for another one who does not deceive them but serves their interests.

 

Although, the best thing would be to have a dialogue with the parliamentarians of the BECA Commission and with their experts in early cancer detection and together, using logic, analyze publicly the best strategy to reduce premature cancer deaths and costs.

 

If the path of dialogue does not work, a reporter can point out that the essence of Holmes’s faults, who faces 20 years in prison, is that she lied to the public that the blood test worked while she was well aware that it did not.

 

In the case of the Parliamentarians of the European Commission BECA the faults are the same because they are aware that the screening they propose does not defeat cancer and does not reduce mortality because there are irrefutable data that I report below in the links and in the images.

 

The MP who was not aware of these data, now, after sending this email will no longer be able to say it and therefore will be aware of lying and deceiving the public as it was for Elizabeth Holmes.

 

Here are the links and then the figures: every year cancer costs in Italy 20 billion euros (https://bit.ly/3qVv9pS), without obtaining the results of a reduction in mortality which is instead constant or slightly increasing (https://bit.ly/3fUUDjW) on a constant population for several years (https://bit.ly/3pv3qwe)

Figura 2. Pubblicato da AIOM. Ogni anno il cancro costa all’Italia 20 miliardi di euro (https://bit.ly/3qVv9pS

Figura 3. Pubblicato da AIOM. Ogni anno la mortalità da cancro è pressoché costante o in lieve aumento (https://bit.ly/3fUUDjW).

Figura 4. Pubblicato da Tuttitalia. Ogni anno la popolazione in Italia è pressoché costante dal 2006, in lieve diminuzione dal 2018 (https://bit.ly/3pv3qwe).

 

Furthermore, there is several evidence, which I can provide, that for more than twenty years the 3D-Flow and 3D-CBS innovations and recently the TB-CAD innovation to save millions of lives and save billions of euros have not only been ignored but worse still by some decision makers they have been deliberately censored/suppressed damaging the whole of humanity.

 

Here are some facts and data of illogicality. Further details can be found in the previous messages of the emails to the administrative expert of the European Union, Dr. Valentina Barbuto and the Honorable Guido Crosetto.

 

When would it be addressed the illogicality:

 

1. to blather blah, blah, blah that early detection saves over 50% of lives and then choose screening tools and procedures that only find cancers when they have millions (a few millimeters) or a billion (1 cm) of cancer cells instead of 100 cells?

 

2. not to test the effectiveness of a cancer screening tool or procedure on a sample population of 0.01% (60,000 people) of the 60 million Italians in a specific territory and to verify that it reduces mortality and relative costs compared to previous years in the same area or with respect to an area where this test or procedure is not carried out, before extending them to a national level, impoverishing only the Italians?

 

3. of parliamentarians and executives to fund screening equipment and tests that find cancers only when they have millions (a few millimeters) or a billion (1 cm) of cancer cells and censor and suppress the 3D-CBS invention for 21 years that has been confirmed in 2019 by third-party measurements on a less efficient and more expensive copy of 3D-CBS that can find small tumors with only 100 cancerous cells and that could already have saved millions of lives and billiond of Euros to healthcare?

 

4. not to ask the 15 experts in early cancer detection appointed to defeat cancer (https://bit.ly/30ewhMK) by the European Commission (BECA) during the hearing on March 23, 2021, to take responsibility for providing calculations that report concrete numbers of costs and lives saved year after year for 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 years to be contrasted with the table of 2.6 million lives saved and 355 billion euros saved with 3D-CBS (https://bit.ly/2NvM57i) that will have to be verified year after year with experimental results measured on a sample population in a specific territory?

 

5. of the parliamentarians and executives who have at their disposal and plan to spend billions of euros to provide doctors, health workers, nurses, volunteers who work on the front line with cancer patients (and who give soul and body, many work for free , and some even give their lives to alleviate suffering and death to cancer patients), only screening tools that are not effective in finding tumors with only 100 cancerous cells when highly treatable with less effort by the caregiver, making them unable to save the patient’s life instead?

 

6. of parliamentarians and executives responsible for the cost of cancer of over 400 billion euros in Italy in the last 21 years (20 years x €20 billion / year = € 400 billion) without obtaining significant results in reducing cancer mortality in Italy with a constant population, while if they had financed the 3D-CBS project with a few million euros, they would have saved over a million lives and over 100 billion euros according to the calculations on page 4 of the table (https://bit.ly/2NvM57i). Furthermore, they have not taken on the responsibility of following a simple logical path, asking questions that a high school student is able to answer.

 

7. In summary, the illogicality of parliamentarians and managers consists in preferring a diagnosis based on a single inefficient examination with respect to the calculation of the variations of the anomalous biological processes recorded by examinations carried out every three, six months or a year using the same equipment, the same protocol and the same dose of radiation. This would give the doctor the opportunity to understand the minimal abnormal activity of the tumor, whether in regression or increasing activity and to make an informed choice whether to intervene or not.

 

8. And finally, the illogicality of parliamentarians and executives is demonstrated by the decision to bear a cost of cancer of over 400 billion euros in Italy in the last 20 years, by adopting technologies that have not provided a significant reduction in premature cancer deaths and on the other hand, not having made available a few million euros to build my 3D-CBS invention in order to be able to perform measurements and bring the benefits to citizens. In the absence of logical/scientific arguments that could invalidate my calculations and claims that year after year, since I presented my invention in 2000 are confirmed valid by experimental results, it is more urgent than ever to finance the construction of at least two 3D-CBS units rather than further delaying the benefits to citizens.

 

At this point I would not want to be misunderstood that I advise against the screening exams currently on the market. Instead, I can tell you that I make them myself, because Healthcare offers nothing better.

 

On October 15, 2021 I had the annual PSA test for prostate cancer screening, on December 3, 2020 I had the third regularly scheduled colonoscopy exam in the last 25 years.

 

Does having a colonoscopy exam every 10 or 5 years reduce the risk of discovering advanced cancer? It is a single organ and cancer can develop in all other organs.

 

Common sense and logic should advise everyone that a 3D-CBS exam every year (or more frequently if necessary), which covers all the organs of the body, greatly reduces the risk of discovering cancer late when survival is reduced. drastically.

 

How many colonoscopy exams can be done each year in Italy? How much would all these exams cost?

 

Assuming 0.1% colon cancer mortality how much will it cost to save a life through colon cancer early detection with colonoscopy?

 

In my table (https://bit.ly/2NvM57i) I have made these calculations: experts who claim they can save many lives with colonoscopy screening will have to present their calculations and express approval and/or disapproval of mine.

 

On behalf of cancer patients, I thank you for your attention and I am available to answer any questions (which you can submit to my personal address crosettodario (at) gmail.com), which provide evidence supporting what is stated in my documents and then if we worked together through the dialogue, using your logic and that of your experts, we will TOGETHER have the STRENGTH to Defeat Cancer.

 

Sincerely,

 

Dario Crosetto

 

 

On November 22^th, 2021, I sent this message to my cousin Honorable Guido Crosetto.

 

Full document in italian at: https://bit.ly/30OzyCJ

On Facebook in Italian at: https://bit.ly/3HLhfiw

On the Web Site in Italian at: https://bit.ly/3cDatgF

 

Subject: Dario Crosetto asks his cousin Guido Crosetto to point out in his public appearances on TV and in newspapers the inconsistency that cancer costs in Italy 20 billion euros every year, without reducing mortality in a constant population, because MPs and executives make illogical choices

 

Dear Guido,

I read your Tweet: “Cancers are not gifts, because very often they disrupt people’s lives, leading them to death. For the lucky ones, if anything, they are experiences that radically change you, making you understand how many stupid things you were worried about before. In my opinion and in my experience. ”

 

But these are “words ...” if you want I can add other testimonies on how cancer disrupt people’s lives, however, when instead would be addressed the facts of the inconsistency that cancer costs in Italy 20 billion euros every year (https://bit.ly/3qVv9pS), without obtaining results of a reduction in mortality which is instead constant or slightly increasing (https://bit.ly/3fUUDjW) on a population that has been constant for several years (https://bit.ly/3pv3qwe)?

 

 

 

 

 

On November 15^th, 2021, I submitted to the Members of the European Beating Cancer Committee (BECA):

Full document in pdf in English at: https://bit.ly/30vZnYl – In Italian at: https://bit.ly/3bZrhOG

On Facebook in English at: https://bit.ly/3HtIpdF – In Italian at: https://bit.ly/3kv6kQf

On the Web-Site in English at: https://bit.ly/3CjSvdA – In Italian at: https://bit.ly/3Hameck   

 

Subject: What are the priority commitments of Members of the European Parliament with respect to saving over 20 million lives from premature cancer death and reducing healthcare costs by over € 2,000 billion in the next 30 years in EUROPE?

 

Over the past 17 months the European BEating CAncer Committee (BECA) has held several meetings, has appointed 15 experts in early cancer detection on March 23, 2021 (https://bit.ly/30ewhMK), went on a trip on 3- 4 November 2021, to Geneva and Lyon to meet other experts (https://bit.ly/3kxR5FY, https://bit.ly/31YWdwH). Together they drafted the report (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BECA-PR-693752_EN.pdf) with 1,537 amendments.

 

With all these meetings, presentations and documents they promise to DEFEAT CANCER if they can have billions of EUROS from the taxpayers to finance their proposal/strategy.

 

However, no one can find in all those presentations and documents by the experts the procedure or screening device that can demonstrate by calculations and measurements on a sample population of 0.02% (90,000 people) of the entire population of 450 million Europeans that is effective in significantly reducing cancer deaths and costs compared to another area where the proposed procedure or screening device is not used.

 

This is illogical, it’s like wanting to travel 5,000 miles in 8 hours by plane but not having a plane and not having the slightest idea how to build a plane.

 

It is as if one wanted to take a plane trip without having a plane. Or as if Christopher Columbus wanted to go to the Indies (America) without thinking that he will need three caravels but continuing to ask Queen Isabella of Castile for taxpayers’ money to pay swimmers, convincing them to swim west by promising that they will find gold and riches and they will live like nabobs, even though Christopher Columbus knew instead that they will die in the enterprise because the promises are not logical.

 

The illogic goes even further because the European Union has been ignoring the invention of 3D-CBS (3-D Complete Body Screening) for 21 years, not responding with logical/scientific arguments and not financing two 3D-CBS units with a few million euros demonstrating they can save 260 lives per year for each unit, reducing the cost of each life saved from cancer to 1/80, with the potential to save over 20 million lives and reduce healthcare costs by over 2 trillion euro in the next 30 years, building 4,000 3D-CBS units in 11 years and 800 additional units over the next 19 years, thus replacing the old units.

On November 7^th, 2021, I submitted to the Members of the European Beating Cancer Committee (BECA):

Full document in pdf in English at: https://bit.ly/3wtpI4L – In Italian:  https://bit.ly/3D0ZwRv

On Facebook in English at: https://bit.ly/3oa7b9U – In Italian at: https://bit.ly/3wrtHyX

On the Web-Site in English at: https://bit.ly/303qSYM – In Italian at: https://bit.ly/3H0YXcR

 

 

Subject: Illogical plan to spend billions of EURO without first proving the cancer screening test intended to be extended to all Europeans to be effective in reducing mortality rate

 

Why BECA is planning to spend billions of EURO on screening procedures not effective to reduce cancer deaths and costs and is not funding my 3D-CBS that can prove saving millions of lives and trillions of EURO?

 

It is illogical to plan to spend billions of EURO of taxpayer money to extend to all Europeans a breast cancer screening test and many other screening tests that cannot provide effectiveness in reducing cancer deaths without first proving the screening test intended to be extended to all Europeans to be effective in reducing mortality rate more than 50% on a sample population.

 

Besides illuding and deceiving 90% of the people in high risk groups of the countries who perform those screening tests, extending to the other 6% it is only impoverishing everyone else?

 

450 million Europeans want to know from scientists what works best
in reducing suffering, deaths and costs of cancer

 

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT – Parliamentary questions

21 June 2021 (Translated in 24 languages) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-003244_EN.html

 

The answer is provided through the Dialogue

 

Dialogue between Dario Crosetto and BECA experts in strategies showing calculations and scientific evidence on how each project/procedure can quantitatively reduce cancer deaths and costs in 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 years and compare it with the 3D-CBS invention/project

 

On October 31^st, 2021, I submitted to the Members of the European Beating Cancer Committee (BECA):

Full document in pdf in English at: https://bit.ly/2ZLJTPx – In Italian at: https://bit.ly/3CEdJDF

On Facebook in English at: https://bit.ly/3kDygRO – In Italian at: https://bit.ly/2ZOTNji

On the Web-Site in English at: https://bit.ly/3EyPJCM – In Italian at: https://bit.ly/2ZRajiT

 

Dear member of the BECA committee,

 

It is illogical to plan to spend billions of EURO of taxpayer money funding proposals and strategies claiming to Beat Cancer without requesting a plan estimating the efficacy of each proposal and strategy in reducing cancer deaths and healthcare costs and, after funding a plan to measure such efficacy on a sample population in a specific location showing significant reduction in cancer deaths and costs compare to the years before in the same location and compared to other locations where such plan is not implemented.

 

The answer is provided through the Dialogue

 

Dialogue between Dario Crosetto and IEEE at the Workshop:

“Challenges moving from the lab bench to clinical practice for nuclear medicine”

held online from Japan on 23 October 2021

 

Following I am providing the result of the Dialogue at the most important international conference in the world in this field with scientists who have the responsibility to determine scientifically what works best in reducing cancer deaths and costs.

 

In pdf at: https://bit.ly/2ZoGUw7 Screenshots at: https://bit.ly/3GhYMcU, in-depth dialogue at: https://bit.ly/2X4XVuc

 

On Sept. 27th, 2021, I submitted to the Members of the European Beating Cancer Committee (BECA):

Full document in pdf in English at: https://bit.ly/3m103M1

On Facebook in English at: https://bit.ly/3EyrnsI

On the Web-Site in English at: https://bit.ly/39Mdrhb

 

Subject: Letter to EU-BECA Committee in regard the 27 Sept. 2021 meeting’s objective: “Turning the tide on cancer: the view of the National Parliaments on Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan“. Submission of a plan to save from cancer over 2.6 million lives and over €355 billion in ITALY and over 20 million lives and over €2 trillion in EUROPE in 30 years. I respectfully request to allow me to present my strategic plan in an oral presentation to the members of the BECA Committee and give me the opportunity to answer their questions.

 

Dear Honorable Bartosz ARLUKOWICZ, Dear Honorable Véronique TRILLET – LENOIR

 

1. line-by-line questions/comments to items 31-41 of the “Chapter II of your BECA DRAFT 2020/2267(INI) (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BECA-PR-693752_EN.pdf). My questions/comments can be found in the pdf document at: https://bit.ly/2Y4lCU3 or below in an image document

 

1. irrefutable references that ITALY has a cancer cost of €20 billion per year, while the population is constant and the number of cancer deaths per year are slightly increasing instead of decreasing. This proves that the €20 billion per year are not spent effectively to reduce cancer deaths and costs. 

 

1. I am providing a detailed strategic plan that can be tested with existing, very expensive devices at a very high cost of $10,000 per examination, which are copies of my 3D-CBS invention. However, funding my 3D-CBS invention then will cost only $200 per screening test, my claims of the lives and money saved can be verified experimentally on 0.02% of the European population (90,000 people per year) and then extend it to the 450 million population.

 

1. I am providing the summary of the strategic plan to save from cancer over 2.6 million lives and over €355 billion in ITALY in 30 years by building 450 units 3D-CBS in 8 years and additional 100 units in the following 22 years to replace the old machines. 

 

1. I am providing the summary of the strategic plan to save from cancer over 20 million lives and over €2 trillion in EUROPE in 30 years by building 4000 units 3D-CBS in 11 years and additional 800 units in the following 19 years to replace the old machines.

On September 8th, 2021, I submitted to the Members of the European Beating Cancer Committee (BECA):

Full document in pdf in English at: https://bit.ly/3njgGoq

On Facebook in English at: https://bit.ly/3CBjKBd

On the Web-Site in English at: https://bit.ly/3nkzUJY

 

On July 15th, 2021, I submitted to the Members of the European Beating Cancer Committee (BECA):

Full document in pdf in English at: https://bit.ly/2TigQ2W

On Facebook in English at: https://bit.ly/3mxRaLw

On the Web-Site in English at: https://bit.ly/3EAMcDY

Dear Honorable Véronique TRILLET – LENOIR and Honorable Pietro Fiocchi,

 

Before your meeting, when BECA Rapporteur Véronique Trillet-Lenoir presented her draft report “Strengthening Europe in the fight against cancer – towards a comprehensive and coordinated strategy” (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BECA-PR-693752_EN.pdf) to the Members of the Beating Cancer Committee and with John-F Ryan, Director Public Health, DG SANTE, I sent you the letter available at the above links:

Following I provide more details about each of the above items submitted on September 27th, 2021, however, I would like to have the opportunity to explain more details and answer your questions in an oral presentation.

 

1. line-by-line questions/comments to items 31-41 of the “Chapter II of your BECA DRAFT 2020/2267(INI) (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BECA-PR-693752_EN.pdf).

 

 

2. Global annual cancer cost in Italy vs. mortality rate:

ITALY spends €20 billion per year on cancer (https://bit.ly/3qVv9pS), while the only time that there has been a decrease in cancer deaths in Italy has been treaty of 1,134 lives saved between 2012 and 2013 (https://bit.ly/3fUUDjW), while in other years cancer deaths increased in the absence of a population increase (https://bit.ly/3pv3qwe), so the €20 billion/year mainly increased the cancer business (while there are people on the front line who give body and soul, work for free, and some even give their lives, such as doctors, nurses, law enforcement, and public service workers who died of COVID-19 to save others, even without resources, to alleviate cancer suffering and mortality).

 

3. An exam on the EXPLORER costs over $10,000 (https://bit.ly/3554QnH) instead of $200 on the 3D-CBS (https://bit.ly/2NvM57i, 50 times less). Funding my 3D-CBS invention then will cost only $200 per screening test, my claims of the lives and money saved can be verified experimentally on 0.02% of the European population (90,000 people per year) and then extend it to the 450 million population. Anyone claiming a reduction of cancer death and cost, whether a drug, vaccine, diagnostic device combined with treatment, etc., should present a plan to test at least 10,000 people ages 55-74 taken from a location where the cancer mortality rate has been constant for the past 20 years. A difference or no difference in the mortality rate will quantify the success or failure of the proposed solution. Taking as reference experimental data confirmed by WHO (World Health Organization), NCI (National Cancer Institute) and ACS (American Cancer Society) as well as many universities that cancer has a survival rate of up to 98% when detected at an early stage, and assuming a conservative figure for the 3D-CBS to offer a success rate above 58%, then each 3D-CBS device is expected to save over 260 lives each year, according to the calculations described below. Assuming the death rate in the age group 55 to 74 for the past 20 years is 0.5% in the location where the test is planned (this data can be verified), then of the 90,000 individuals, 450 are expected to die. If we apply the factor 58% survival rate due to early detection with the 3D-CBS device combined with successful treatment, each year the 3D-CBS device could save over 260 lives (450 x 58% = 261).

 

4. I am providing the summary of the strategic plan to save from cancer over 2.6 million lives and over €355 billion in ITALY in 30 years by building 450 units 3D-CBS in 8 years and additional 100 units in the following 22 years to replace the old machines.

Graph of the estimated lives saved and revenues plan for 30 years when using the 3D-CBS device. In the background is the table from which the graphs have been generated that can be accessed and modified interactively at: http://bit.ly/2XI2OFz. This table is a very powerful tool to design a strategic plan for different devices (EXPLORER, 3D-CBS, Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra, etc.), products, vaccines, drugs, or procedures, and calculate the efficacy over 30 years for the proposed claimed reductions in cancer deaths and costs estimated theoretically in row 16. As measurements are performed year after year on real devices and by implementing the proposed test protocol, values in row 16 are corrected providing a more accurate estimate of the total number of lives and costs saved in 30 years. The user of this table needs to introduce the values in rows 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, which are easy to determine from calculations referring to existing experimental data or products. Data introduced in row 13 estimating the total number of units manufactured each year to reach 564 units in 30 years..

5. I am providing the summary of the strategic plan to save from cancer over 20 million lives and over €2 trillion in EUROPE in 30 years by building 4000 units 3D-CBS in 11 years and additional 800 units in the following 19 years to replace the old machines

Graph of the estimated lives saved and revenues plan for 30 years when using the 3D-CBS device. In the background is the table from which the graphs have been generated that can be accessed and modified interactively at: http://bit.ly/2XI2OFz. This table is a very powerful tool to design a strategic plan for different devices (EXPLORER, 3D-CBS, Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra, etc.), products, vaccines, drugs, or procedures, and calculate the efficacy over 30 years for the proposed claimed reductions in cancer deaths and costs estimated theoretically in row 16. As measurements are performed year after year on real devices and by implementing the proposed test protocol, values in row 16 are corrected providing a more accurate estimate of the total number of lives and costs saved in 30 years. The user of this table needs to introduce the values in rows 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, which are easy to determine from calculations referring to existing experimental data or products. Data introduced in row 13 estimating the total number of units manufactured each year to reach 4,809 units in 30 years might face the same skepticism as COVID-19 faced last year. However, when the world realizes the importance and urgency of saving millions of lives, even the most challenging problems are solved. If in less than one year several companies were able to produce billions of COVID-19 vaccines, masks, and PPEs, the problem of producing 4,809 3D-CBS units would be a comparatively easy job.

Summary of the strategic plan to save from cancer over 100 million lives and over $27 trillion in the WORLD in 30 years by building 4,000 units 3D-CBS in 11 years and additional 53,000 units in the following 19 years.

Graph of the estimated lives saved and revenues plan for 30 years when using the 3D-CBS device. In the background is the table from which the graphs have been generated that can be accessed and modified interactively at: http://bit.ly/2XI2OFz. This table is a very powerful tool to design a strategic plan for different devices (EXPLORER, 3D-CBS, Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra, etc.), products, vaccines, drugs, or procedures, and calculate the efficacy over 30 years for the proposed claimed reductions in cancer deaths and costs estimated theoretically in row 16. As measurements are performed year after year on real devices and by implementing the proposed test protocol, values in row 16 are corrected providing a more accurate estimate of the total number of lives and costs saved in 30 years. The user of this table needs to introduce the values in rows 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, which are easy to determine from calculations referring to existing experimental data or products. Data introduced in row 13 estimating the total number of units manufactured each year to reach 57,409 units in 30 years might face the same skepticism as COVID-19 faced last year. However, when the world realizes the importance and urgency of saving millions of lives, even the most challenging problems are solved. If in less than one year several companies were able to produce billions of COVID-19 vaccines, masks, and PPEs, the problem of producing57,409 3D-CBS units would be a comparatively easy job.

I assumed that Ms Gabriel who provided the written answer to the Parliamentary Question -E-003244/2021 must be an expert on Cancer, member of the BECA committee. It would be important to have a dialogue with her, could you provide her family name and her contact information so we could organize a public debate on this very important issue?

 

I am looking forward to receive your response indicating a date and time I can present my strategic plan at the European Beating Cancer Committee in Brussels.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Dario Crosetto

President of the Crosetto Foundation for the reduction in cancer deaths –

DeSoto, TX 75115 – USA

 

CROSETTO FOUNDATION WAS AWARDED GOLD SEAL OF TRANSPARENCY FOR 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021